Past, Present, and Future Research on Youth Homelessness at Chapin Hall

Agenda

  • Voices of Youth Count
  • Youth Homelessness Data Solutions Project
  • System Assessment
  • Direct Cash Transfers

Voices of Youth Count

Voices of Youth Count

National research and policy initiative designed to:

  • Fill critical gaps in our knowledge about homeless youth
  • Inform federal, state, and local policy development
  • Improve service provision
  • Build a foundation for future research
  • Contribute to efforts to prevent and end youth homelessness

Funders

  • Arcus Foundation
  • Campion Foundation
  • Raikes Foundation
  • The Ballmer Group Philanthropy
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Casey family Programs
  • Liberty Mutual Insurance
  • Elton John Aids Foundation
  • Melville Charitable Trust
  • Chapin at the University of Chicago
  • U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development

Voices of Youth Count Components

  • Local point-in-time counts
  • Youth, household, service provider, and CoC surveys
  • In-depth youth interviews
  • Intervention evidence reviews
  • Policy analysis

Urban

  • San Diego County, CA (San Diego)
  • Cook County, IL (Chicago)
  • Philadelphia County, PA (Philadelphia)
  • Travis County, TX (Austin)
  • King County, WA (Seattle)
  • Alameda County, CA (Oakland)
  • Denver County, CO (Denver)
  • In-Depth Interview Sites
  • Hennepin County, MN (Minneapolis)
  • Orleans Parish, LA (New Orleans)
  • Wayne County, MI (Detroit)
  • Davidson County, TN (Nashville)
  • Suffolk County, MA (Boston)
  • Orange County, FL (Orlando)

Medium/Small Town

Walla Walla County, WA

Ada County, ID

Boyd County, KY

In-Depth Interview Sites

Suburban

Cleveland County, OK

Delaware County, OH

Cecil County, MD

Rural

Mariposa County, CA

Livingston County, MO

Kennebec County, ME

Defining homelessness

Broad definition of homelessness

  • Sheltered
  • Unsheltered
  • Unstably housed

Cook County Brief Youth Survey Results

Sample

  • Surveyed 689 youth ages 13 to 25
  • 89% age 18 and older

Over-represented groups

  • Male Youths 56%
  • Black Youth 65%
  • LGBTQ Youth 25%

1/3 of the young women were pregnant or parents

SYSTEMS INVOLVEMENT

Half of the homeless youth in Cook County reported prior child welfare or justice system involvement

System involvement

  • Detention or Incarceration only 26%
  • Foster Care only 10%
  • Both Detention or Incarceration and Foster Care 14%

Cook County In-depth Interview Results

Sample

  • Interviewed 40 youth ages 13 to 25
  • 90% age 18 and older

Over-represented Groups

  • Male Youths 53%
  • Black Youth 60%
  • LGBTQ Youth 43%

System Involvement

  • Foster Care 30%
  • Detention/Jail/Prison 35%

History of Instability

  • Abuse and neglect
  • Parent mental illness or drug abuse
  • Poverty
  • Family homelessness*
  • Family separation
  • Bouncing around foster care placements

Foster care was part of a larger pattern of instability

PATHWAYS FROM FOSTER CARE INTO HOMELESSNESS

About half of the young people with a history of foster care had been reunified or adopted

Youth Homelessness Data Solutions Project

Funded by HUD to develop innovative methods for using linked administrative data

  • Produce counts of homeless youth
  • Estimate the prevalence and incidence of youth homelessness
  • Describe the characteristics of the homeless youth population
  • Analyze pathways into homelessness from youth-serving systems
  • Identify predictors of youth homeless through those different pathways

Analyzing Linked Administrative Data from Multiple Sources in South Carolina

  • South Carolina's four CoC's
  • Department of Education
  • Department of Social Services
  • Department of Juvenile Justice
  • Department of Mental Health

Systems Assessment

Young People Experiencing Homeless Need a Youth Centered Homelessness System that is Responsive to their Needs

  • Developmentally appropriate services and supports reflective of youth preferences
  • Based on an understanding of factors young people weigh when deciding whether to engage with a homeless service provider

Developing a Youth-centered Homelessness System

Understanding of the Current System

  • What programs and services are available to young people experiencing homelessness?
  • How many young people are being served by those and what are their characteristics?
  • What is the system's capacity to serve those young people?
  • What are the experiences of young people with the system?

Developing a Youth-centered Homelessness System

Understanding of the Factors Young People Consider When Accessing Services

  • Is eligibility conditional upon rule compliance?
  • Does the environment feel safe?
  • Is the service provider perceived as trustworthy and nonjudgmental?
  • How might their identity affect the treatment they receive?

Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago

A Youth Homelessness System Assessment for New York city

May 2019

(Report)

Mixed Method Youth Homelessness System Rapid Assessment Method

  • Agency data review
  • Online survey of community-based organizations
  • Youth focus groups
  • Stakeholder focus groups & interviews

Pathways + Trust Youth

Direct Cash Transfers to Address Youth Homelessness

A Collaborative Process Shaped the Initiative

Building an Effective Cash Transfer Program for Youth

  • Center on Youth, Equity, and Trust
  • Adopt a Flexible and Simple Approach
  • Boost Housing Stability and Empowerment
  • Identify and Manage Barriers to Success

Pathways Study

  • 30-month longitudinal study (monthly surveys, administrative data)
  • Data sharing

Trust Youth Initiative

  • Cash+ Program
  • Cash + optional supportive services
  • Implementation, process and outcomes evaluation

Early Findings

  • Saving money/building a safety net
  • Leveraging funds to pursue goals & explore career options
  • More food secure and able to focus on education and employment goals if housed
  • No negative consequences reported

Multisite Initiative

Scoping

LA County

Hennepin County

Boston Area

Baltimore

Pre-Implementation

Oakland

San Francisco

Implementation

New York

Questions and discussion

Upstream

Multi-tiered System of Support for Preventing Youth Homelessness and School Dropout

  • Universal screening survey
  • Triage
  • Referrals
  • Adaptation, implementation, & evaluation in 3 jurisdictions
  • Partnerships with school district and youth/family-serving community-based organization

Education & Employment

  • 56% of the 13 to 17-year-olds were attending school
  • 60% of the 18 to 25-year-olds had a high school diploma or GED
  • 47% of the 18 to 25-year-olds were working and/or in school