Past, Present, and Future Research on Youth Homelessness at Chapin Hall
Agenda
- Voices of Youth Count
- Youth Homelessness Data Solutions Project
- System Assessment
- Direct Cash Transfers
Voices of Youth Count
Voices of Youth Count
National research and policy initiative designed to:
- Fill critical gaps in our knowledge about homeless youth
- Inform federal, state, and local policy development
- Improve service provision
- Build a foundation for future research
- Contribute to efforts to prevent and end youth homelessness
Funders
- Arcus Foundation
- Campion Foundation
- Raikes Foundation
- The Ballmer Group Philanthropy
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Casey family Programs
- Liberty Mutual Insurance
- Elton John Aids Foundation
- Melville Charitable Trust
- Chapin at the University of Chicago
- U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development
Voices of Youth Count Components
- Local point-in-time counts
- Youth, household, service provider, and CoC surveys
- In-depth youth interviews
- Intervention evidence reviews
- Policy analysis
Urban
- San Diego County, CA (San Diego)
- Cook County, IL (Chicago)
- Philadelphia County, PA (Philadelphia)
- Travis County, TX (Austin)
- King County, WA (Seattle)
- Alameda County, CA (Oakland)
- Denver County, CO (Denver)
- In-Depth Interview Sites
- Hennepin County, MN (Minneapolis)
- Orleans Parish, LA (New Orleans)
- Wayne County, MI (Detroit)
- Davidson County, TN (Nashville)
- Suffolk County, MA (Boston)
- Orange County, FL (Orlando)
Medium/Small Town
Walla Walla County, WA
Ada County, ID
Boyd County, KY
In-Depth Interview Sites
Suburban
Cleveland County, OK
Delaware County, OH
Cecil County, MD
Rural
Mariposa County, CA
Livingston County, MO
Kennebec County, ME
Defining homelessness
Broad definition of homelessness
- Sheltered
- Unsheltered
- Unstably housed
Cook County Brief Youth Survey Results
Sample
- Surveyed 689 youth ages 13 to 25
- 89% age 18 and older
Over-represented groups
- Male Youths 56%
- Black Youth 65%
- LGBTQ Youth 25%
1/3 of the young women were pregnant or parents
SYSTEMS INVOLVEMENT
Half of the homeless youth in Cook County reported prior child welfare or justice system involvement
System involvement
- Detention or Incarceration only 26%
- Foster Care only 10%
- Both Detention or Incarceration and Foster Care 14%
Cook County In-depth Interview Results
Sample
- Interviewed 40 youth ages 13 to 25
- 90% age 18 and older
Over-represented Groups
- Male Youths 53%
- Black Youth 60%
- LGBTQ Youth 43%
System Involvement
- Foster Care 30%
- Detention/Jail/Prison 35%
History of Instability
- Abuse and neglect
- Parent mental illness or drug abuse
- Poverty
- Family homelessness*
- Family separation
- Bouncing around foster care placements
Foster care was part of a larger pattern of instability
PATHWAYS FROM FOSTER CARE INTO HOMELESSNESS
About half of the young people with a history of foster care had been reunified or adopted
Youth Homelessness Data Solutions Project
Funded by HUD to develop innovative methods for using linked administrative data
- Produce counts of homeless youth
- Estimate the prevalence and incidence of youth homelessness
- Describe the characteristics of the homeless youth population
- Analyze pathways into homelessness from youth-serving systems
- Identify predictors of youth homeless through those different pathways
Analyzing Linked Administrative Data from Multiple Sources in South Carolina
- South Carolina's four CoC's
- Department of Education
- Department of Social Services
- Department of Juvenile Justice
- Department of Mental Health
Systems Assessment
Young People Experiencing Homeless Need a Youth Centered Homelessness System that is Responsive to their Needs
- Developmentally appropriate services and supports reflective of youth preferences
- Based on an understanding of factors young people weigh when deciding whether to engage with a homeless service provider
Developing a Youth-centered Homelessness System
Understanding of the Current System
- What programs and services are available to young people experiencing homelessness?
- How many young people are being served by those and what are their characteristics?
- What is the system's capacity to serve those young people?
- What are the experiences of young people with the system?
Developing a Youth-centered Homelessness System
Understanding of the Factors Young People Consider When Accessing Services
- Is eligibility conditional upon rule compliance?
- Does the environment feel safe?
- Is the service provider perceived as trustworthy and nonjudgmental?
- How might their identity affect the treatment they receive?
Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago
A Youth Homelessness System Assessment for New York city
May 2019
(Report)
Mixed Method Youth Homelessness System Rapid Assessment Method
- Agency data review
- Online survey of community-based organizations
- Youth focus groups
- Stakeholder focus groups & interviews
Pathways + Trust Youth
Direct Cash Transfers to Address Youth Homelessness
A Collaborative Process Shaped the Initiative
Building an Effective Cash Transfer Program for Youth
- Center on Youth, Equity, and Trust
- Adopt a Flexible and Simple Approach
- Boost Housing Stability and Empowerment
- Identify and Manage Barriers to Success
Pathways Study
- 30-month longitudinal study (monthly surveys, administrative data)
- Data sharing
Trust Youth Initiative
- Cash+ Program
- Cash + optional supportive services
- Implementation, process and outcomes evaluation
Early Findings
- Saving money/building a safety net
- Leveraging funds to pursue goals & explore career options
- More food secure and able to focus on education and employment goals if housed
- No negative consequences reported
Multisite Initiative
Scoping
LA County
Hennepin County
Boston Area
Baltimore
Pre-Implementation
Oakland
San Francisco
Questions and discussion
Upstream
Multi-tiered System of Support for Preventing Youth Homelessness and School Dropout
- Universal screening survey
- Triage
- Referrals
- Adaptation, implementation, & evaluation in 3 jurisdictions
- Partnerships with school district and youth/family-serving community-based organization
Education & Employment
- 56% of the 13 to 17-year-olds were attending school
- 60% of the 18 to 25-year-olds had a high school diploma or GED
- 47% of the 18 to 25-year-olds were working and/or in school