Projected Illinois County Court Caseload Modifications
Prepared by Commission
October 2011
| County |
Files in Study
(6 months)1 |
Proportion
of Study
Population |
Estimated
Hearings/
Year (study)2 |
Average
Hearings/
Month (study) |
Parole
Violators in
DJJ Facilities3 |
Proportion of
parole violators
in custody |
Proportional
Hearings/
Year (DJJ)2 |
Average.
Hearings/
month (DJJ) |
| STATEWIDE |
370 |
100.00% |
1,100 |
92 |
507 |
100.00% |
1,100 |
92 |
| Adams |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
4 |
0.79% |
9 |
1 |
| Alexander |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
5 |
0.99% |
11 |
1 |
| Bond |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Boone |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Brown |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Bureau |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Calhoun |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Carroll |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Cass |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Champaign |
5 |
1.35% |
15 |
1 |
14 |
2.76% |
30 |
3 |
| Christian |
4 |
1.08% |
12 |
1 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Clark |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Clay |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Clinton |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Coles |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0.99% |
11 |
1 |
| Cook |
116 |
31.35% |
345 |
29 |
181 |
35.70% |
393 |
33 |
| Crawford |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Cumberland |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| DeKalb |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Dewitt |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Douglas |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Dupage |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
3 |
0.59% |
7 |
1 |
| Edgar |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Edwards |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Effingham |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0.59% |
7 |
1 |
| Fayette |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Ford |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Franklin |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Fulton |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Gallatin |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Greene |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Grundy |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Hamilton |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Hancock |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Hardin |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Henderson |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Henry |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Iroquois |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Jackson |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Jasper |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Jefferson |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Jersey |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Jo Daviess |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Johnson |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Kane |
13 |
3.51% |
39 |
3 |
8 |
1.58% |
17 |
1 |
| Kankakee |
15 |
4.05% |
45 |
4 |
17 |
3.35% |
37 |
3 |
| Kendall |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0.99% |
11 |
1 |
| Knox |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Lake |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
5 |
0.99% |
11 |
1 |
| Lasalle |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
6 |
1.18% |
13 |
1 |
| Lawrence |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Lee |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Livingston |
5 |
1.35% |
15 |
1 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Logan |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
3 |
0.59% |
7 |
1 |
| Macon |
15 |
4.05% |
45 |
4 |
14 |
2.76% |
30 |
3 |
| Macoupin |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Madison |
15 |
4.05% |
45 |
4 |
21 |
4.14% |
46 |
4 |
| Marion |
4 |
1.08% |
12 |
1 |
5 |
0.99% |
11 |
1 |
| Marshall |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Mason |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Massac |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| McDonough |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| McHenry |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| McLean |
8 |
2.16% |
24 |
2 |
5 |
0.99% |
11 |
1 |
| Menard |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Mercer |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Monroe |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Montgomery |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Morgan |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Moultrie |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Ogle |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Peoria |
18 |
4.86% |
54 |
4 |
36 |
7.10% |
78 |
7 |
| Perry |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0.59% |
7 |
1 |
| Piatt |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Pike |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Pope |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Pulaski |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Putnam |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Randolph |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Richland |
2 |
0.54% |
6 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Rock Island |
17 |
4.59% |
51 |
4 |
20 |
3.94% |
43 |
4 |
| Saline |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Sangamon |
10 |
2.70% |
30 |
2 |
9 |
1.78% |
20 |
2 |
| Schuyler |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Scott |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Shelby |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| St. Clair |
5 |
1.35% |
15 |
1 |
9 |
1.78% |
20 |
2 |
| Stark |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Stephenson |
6 |
1.62% |
18 |
1 |
6 |
1.18% |
13 |
1 |
| Tazewell |
6 |
1.62% |
18 |
1 |
7 |
1.38% |
15 |
1 |
| Union |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Vermillion |
18 |
4.86% |
54 |
4 |
18 |
3.55% |
39 |
3 |
| Wabash |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Warren |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Washington |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| Wayne |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
| White |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
| Whiteside |
0 |
0.00% |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0.39% |
4 |
0 |
| Will |
6 |
1.62% |
18 |
1 |
8 |
1.58% |
17 |
1 |
| Williamson |
3 |
0.81% |
9 |
1 |
4 |
0.79% |
9 |
1 |
| Winnebago |
21 |
5.68% |
62 |
5 |
33 |
6.51% |
72 |
6 |
| Woodford |
1 |
0.27% |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0.20% |
2 |
0 |
Footers
- The Commission's study included 386 parole files, but the committing county could only be identified in 370 counties. Proportional representation is calculated against the 370 files with attributed counties.
- The number of total annual revocation hearings used (1,100) was obtained by averaging the revocation hearings reported in the Prisoner Review Board's most recent annual reports (FY04-FY09). The actual number of hearings should be lower, due to the trend of declining DJJ committments as well as the reforms outlined in this report (e.g. implementation of youth-appropriate parole conditions, expansion of the Aftercare Specialist position, and increased use of graduated sanctions prior to revocation proceedings), all of which should significantly reduce revocation proceedings.
- This column represents the total number of youth currently incarcerated in DJJ due to both technical violations and new charges.
